People review and approve
Define where human judgment is required. AI supports the work; designated people retain oversight and approval.
AI governance · Nuclear mission
AI governance supporting the nuclear mission.
We help nuclear mission organizations govern AI with human oversight, accountable decisions, cybersecurity oversight, and evidence that can be traced.
Our approach
Governance that keeps people accountable.
AI in a nuclear context calls for clear responsibility, deliberate oversight, and records that make decisions understandable.
Make responsibility clear
Keep decision ownership visible, with clear review practices and escalation when outputs need further scrutiny.
Keep a reviewable record
Maintain evidence of AI use, human review, and cybersecurity oversight so teams can examine what happened and why.
A governance cycle, not a network map
From coordination to review—and back
Illustrative architecture; deployment-specific. No live connection or automatic authorization is implied.
-
HubCloud coordination + server layer
-
Encode ↔ decodeShared, versioned codebooks
-
Edge · optionalRelay layer when deployment calls for it
-
PI infrastructureNuclear / energy environment; deployment-specific
-
Incident / SSP evidenceHuman review informs governance back at Hub
PCM RTOS
Nucleus + SpiderClaw · governance coordination, with human review
Who we support
For organizations entrusted with the mission.
We work with nuclear operators, nuclear mission organizations, and the suppliers that support them.
The focus is practical: establish responsible AI governance, clarify oversight, and make supporting evidence easier to follow.
Start with a conversation about your mission.
Share the context. We’ll discuss where AI governance and oversight can help.